Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: No hash join across partitioned tables?

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: No hash join across partitioned tables?
Date: 2010-03-02 16:16:51
Message-ID: 603c8f071003020816j77b3ec63wbad0415df003c0f1@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-performance
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 7:03 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
>> Did this get addressed?
>
> Partially.  There are stats now but autovacuum is not bright about
> when to update them.

Is that something you're planning to fix for 9.0?  If not, we at least
need to document what we intend for people to do about it.

...Robert

In response to

Responses

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2010-03-02 16:21:15
Subject: Re: GiST index performance
Previous:From: Pierre CDate: 2010-03-02 08:36:48
Subject: Re: SSD + RAID

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-03-02 16:21:28
Subject: Re: USE_LIBXSLT in MSVC builds
Previous:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2010-03-02 16:00:27
Subject: Re: USE_LIBXSLT in MSVC builds

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group