Re: A thought: should we run pgindent now?

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: A thought: should we run pgindent now?
Date: 2010-02-25 22:07:58
Message-ID: 603c8f071002251407y2ed12c9eye73b5380b6d5d528@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 4:48 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>> > Robert Haas wrote:
>> >> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 11:51 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
>> >> > Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> >> >>> I have a TODO on fixing some of the typedef finding. But I can generate
>> >> >>> an up to date version of the list Bruce last used in a day or two, and then
>> >> >>> get this better whacked into shape for another run at the more traditional
>> >> >>> time.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I am ready to run pgindent whenever requested.
>> >> > There is an updated typedefs list at
>> >> > <http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/typedefs.pl>
>> >>
>> >> Bruce, you want to go ahead and do this? ?The sooner the better, AFAICS.
>> >
>> > I am ready.
>>
>> Does that mean you're going to do it, or are you waiting for some sort
>> of OK?  I believe everyone who expressed an opinion is in favor.
>
> I was waiting a few hours to get feedback.  I will do it at 0100 GMT
> (2000 EST).

OK, great! Thanks for the clarification.

...Robert

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2010-02-25 22:09:11 Re: Allow vacuumdb to only analyze
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-02-25 22:01:52 Re: A thought: should we run pgindent now?