2010/2/11 Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>:
> On Thu, 11 Feb 2010, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 3:00 AM, Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su> wrote:
>>>> version I saw hadn't any documentation whatever. It's not committable
>>>> on documentation grounds alone, even if everybody was satisfied about
>>>> the code.
>>> well, there is enough documentation to review patch.
>> Where is there any documentation at all? There are no changes to doc/
>> at all; no README; and not even a lengthy comment block anywhere that
>> I saw. Nor did the email in which the patch was submitted clearly lay
>> out the design of the feature.
> Well, initial knngist announce
> isn't enough to review ? We made test data available to reproduce results,
> see http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/wiki/2009-11-25
> We are here and open to any reviewer's question.
Well, just for example, that doesn't document the changes you made to
the opclass infrastructure, and the reasons for those decisions.
Actually, I've been working on an email on that topic but haven't
gotten around to finishing it. There's some description of the
overall goal of the feature but not much about how you got there. Is
it enough to review? Perhaps, but it would certainly be nice to have
some more discussion of the overall design. IMHO, anyway.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Boszormenyi Zoltan||Date: 2010-02-12 18:22:06|
|Subject: Re: [PATCH] Provide rowcount for utility SELECTs|
|Previous:||From: Josh Berkus||Date: 2010-02-12 18:09:26|
|Subject: Re: Streaming Replication docs|