On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Alvaro Herrera
> Robert Haas escribió:
>> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Alvaro Herrera
>> <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>> > Robert Haas escribió:
>> >> I was all prepared to admit that I hadn't actually looked at the patch
>> >> carefully enough, but I just looked at (and CVS HEAD) again and what
>> >> you've written here doesn't appear to describe what I'm seeing in the
>> >> code:
>> >> if ((portal->strategy != PORTAL_ONE_SELECT) && (!portal->holdStore))
>> >> FillPortalStore(portal, isTopLevel);
>> >> So one of us is confused... it may well be me.
>> > Ah, it seems I misread it ... but then I don't quite see the point in
>> > that change.
>> Well the point is just that Zoltan is adding some more code that
>> applies to both branches of the switch, so merging them saves some
> But then there's no other branches, so why not just put it below the
No, PORTAL_MULTI_QUERY is still separate.
>> > Well, not doing a full review anyway, so never mind me.
>> Actually I was sort of hoping you (or someone other than me) would
>> pick this up for commit...
> Hmm ...
Maybe I came to the wrong place. :-)
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2010-02-11 19:58:01|
|Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove old-style VACUUM FULL (which was known for a little while|
|Previous:||From: Alvaro Herrera||Date: 2010-02-11 19:47:26|
|Subject: Re: [PATCH] Provide rowcount for utility SELECTs|