On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su> wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Feb 2010, Robert Haas wrote:
>
>>> Robert, Mark described the test he did
>>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-01/msg02927.php
>>
>> So why did he get totally different answers than you?
>
> Because I did tests with 8.3 and HEAD+rbtree, while Mark compared
> HEAD and HEAD+rbtree. Also, my HEAD and his HEAD are very different :)
> I will not mention, that we used totally different setup.
>
>>
>> It's not enough to say "somebody else did a test and got better
>> numbers than we did, so let's use theirs".
>
> I'll repeat my tests with current CVS HEAD.

OK... can you post the exact queries that you are used for the
previous round of testing?

...Robert

In response to

• Re: [CFReview] Red-Black Tree at 2010-02-03 21:17:00 from Oleg Bartunov

Responses

• Re: [CFReview] Red-Black Tree at 2010-02-03 21:51:16 from Oleg Bartunov

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Nathan Wagner	Date: 2010-02-03 21:22:15
	Subject: Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings
Previous:	From: Oleg Bartunov	Date: 2010-02-03 21:17:00
	Subject: Re: [CFReview] Red-Black Tree