| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su> |
| Cc: | Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, Mark Cave-Ayland <mark(dot)cave-ayland(at)siriusit(dot)co(dot)uk>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [CFReview] Red-Black Tree |
| Date: | 2010-02-03 21:21:20 |
| Message-ID: | 603c8f071002031321k44524c5ds62075530fe4e448e@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su> wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Feb 2010, Robert Haas wrote:
>
>>> Robert, Mark described the test he did
>>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-01/msg02927.php
>>
>> So why did he get totally different answers than you?
>
> Because I did tests with 8.3 and HEAD+rbtree, while Mark compared
> HEAD and HEAD+rbtree. Also, my HEAD and his HEAD are very different :)
> I will not mention, that we used totally different setup.
>
>>
>> It's not enough to say "somebody else did a test and got better
>> numbers than we did, so let's use theirs".
>
> I'll repeat my tests with current CVS HEAD.
OK... can you post the exact queries that you are used for the
previous round of testing?
...Robert
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Nathan Wagner | 2010-02-03 21:22:15 | Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings |
| Previous Message | Oleg Bartunov | 2010-02-03 21:17:00 | Re: [CFReview] Red-Black Tree |