2010/2/1 KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>:
> (2010/02/02 11:31), Robert Haas wrote:
>> 2010/2/1 KaiGai Kohei<kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>:
>>> (2010/02/02 11:09), Tom Lane wrote:
>>>> KaiGai Kohei<kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com> writes:
>>>>> The attached one also clean up ATPrepAddColumn() and ATExecAddColumn() code,
>>>>> not only ATPrepAlterColumnType(), according to what I mentioned above.
>>>> What exactly do you claim is wrong with the ADD COLUMN case?
>>> ADD COLUMN case works correctly, but it takes unnecessary loops,
>>> because the find_all_inheritors() didn't provide the value to be
>>> set on the new pg_attribute.attinhcount.
>>> I'm saying it can be rewritten in more graceful manner using the
>>> new expected_parents argument.
>> The subject line of this thread is getting less and less appropriate
>> to the content thereof.
>> I am not in favor of doing anything for 9.0 that is not a bug fix.
> Are you talking about ATPrepAddColumn() only? Or both of ATPrepAddColumn()
> and ATPrepAlterColumnType()?
> My motivation to clean up ATPrepAddColumn() is less than the bugfix.
I'm making a general statement - if something is BROKEN (like the
rename case we just dealt with), we should look at fixing it. If it's
just something that could be cleaned up or done more nicely, we should
leave it alone for now.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Alex Hunsaker||Date: 2010-02-02 02:53:05|
|Subject: Re: Package namespace and Safe init cleanup for plperl UPDATE 3 [PATCH]|
|Previous:||From: KaiGai Kohei||Date: 2010-02-02 02:39:07|
|Subject: Re: [BUG?] strange behavior in ALTER TABLE ... RENAME TO
on inherited columns|