| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Hot Standby: Relation-specific deferred conflict resolution |
| Date: | 2010-01-29 18:14:52 |
| Message-ID: | 603c8f071001291014mceb9189v87a2063dfd732060@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 12:23 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
>> Two months on, there is
>> zero sign of any activity on that front
>
> I'm surprised that you call 14 commits in 28 days following a publicly
> available priority list: "zero sign of activity".
>
> Further discussion seems pointless.
Wow, that was an awesome way to quote what I said out of context and
make it sound like I said something ridiculous. The problem I and
others have is not with the quantity of your commits but with the
issues you are choosing (not) to address.
...Robert
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-01-29 18:36:20 | Re: [BUG?] strange behavior in ALTER TABLE ... RENAME TO on inherited columns |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2010-01-29 18:14:19 | Re: Hot Standby: Relation-specific deferred conflict resolution |