Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Hot Standby: Relation-specific deferred conflict resolution

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Hot Standby: Relation-specific deferred conflict resolution
Date: 2010-01-29 18:14:52
Message-ID: 603c8f071001291014mceb9189v87a2063dfd732060@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 12:23 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
>> Two months on, there is
>> zero sign of any activity on that front
>
> I'm surprised that you call 14 commits in 28 days following a publicly
> available priority list: "zero sign of activity".
>
> Further discussion seems pointless.

Wow, that was an awesome way to quote what I said out of context and
make it sound like I said something ridiculous.  The problem I and
others have is not with the quantity of your commits but with the
issues you are choosing (not) to address.

...Robert

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2010-01-29 18:36:20
Subject: Re: [BUG?] strange behavior in ALTER TABLE ... RENAME TO on inherited columns
Previous:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2010-01-29 18:14:19
Subject: Re: Hot Standby: Relation-specific deferred conflict resolution

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group