| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Review: listagg aggregate |
| Date: | 2010-01-28 16:02:21 |
| Message-ID: | 603c8f071001280802l73c359bdv691f42a41c1bf451@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 9:47 PM, Takahiro Itagaki
<itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> * Do we need better names for string_agg1_transfn and string_agg2_transfn?
> They are almost "internal names", but we could have more
> like string_agg_with_sep_transfn.
Surely the names of the transition and final functions should match
the name of the aggregate. But if there's a proposal on the table to
call this string_app_with_sep() instead of just string_agg(), +1 from
me.
...Robert
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tim Bunce | 2010-01-28 16:02:48 | Re: Add on_perl_init and proper destruction to plperl [PATCH] |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-01-28 16:01:23 | Re: Review: listagg aggregate |