On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 8:56 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 8:44 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>>> Well, as long as streaming rep is running, you can't do a smart shutdown
>>> ... smart shutdown seems to treat the walreciever as a client
>>> connection. At the very least, this should be in the documentation.
>> How hard is it to fix?
> I think the first question is do we *want* to fix it, or is it
> appropriate behavior?
> If the master shuts down, will the slaves try to fail over to become
> masters? When the master restarts, will the slaves automatically
> reconnect? If these questions have the wrong answers, shutting down the
> master isn't something to be done lightly, and automatically
> disconnecting slaves would be a real bad idea.
I thought the scenario in question was that someone wanted to manually
shut down the slave. Am I misunderstanding?
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Mark Kirkwood||Date: 2010-01-21 01:59:00|
|Subject: Re: HS/SR and smart shutdown|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2010-01-21 01:56:12|
|Subject: Re: HS/SR and smart shutdown |