Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: HS/SR and smart shutdown

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: HS/SR and smart shutdown
Date: 2010-01-21 01:58:19
Message-ID: 603c8f071001201758t5adce3bfq13ded174744d62f@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 8:56 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 8:44 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>>> Well, as long as streaming rep is running, you can't do a smart shutdown
>>> ... smart shutdown seems to treat the walreciever as a client
>>> connection.  At the very least, this should be in the documentation.
>
>> How hard is it to fix?
>
> I think the first question is do we *want* to fix it, or is it
> appropriate behavior?
>
> If the master shuts down, will the slaves try to fail over to become
> masters?  When the master restarts, will the slaves automatically
> reconnect?  If these questions have the wrong answers, shutting down the
> master isn't something to be done lightly, and automatically
> disconnecting slaves would be a real bad idea.

I thought the scenario in question was that someone wanted to manually
shut down the slave.  Am I misunderstanding?

...Robert

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Mark KirkwoodDate: 2010-01-21 01:59:00
Subject: Re: HS/SR and smart shutdown
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-01-21 01:56:12
Subject: Re: HS/SR and smart shutdown

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group