| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: damage control mode |
| Date: | 2010-01-10 12:53:35 |
| Message-ID: | 603c8f071001100453k518f9b34u35b535566f050ba5@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 2:09 AM, Robert Treat
<xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> wrote:
> But really if beta slips because we don't like the looks of our open issues
> list, thats signicantly better than the last couple releases where we held
> everything up just to get things into CVS months after feature freeze had
> passed us by.
Yes. It seems that we're at least not going to let the final
CommitFest drag on and on and on this time, which seems like a
positive step. But will it help enough to make everyone feel
satisfied with the results? That's less clear.
...Robert
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-01-10 12:55:09 | Re: damage control mode |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2010-01-10 12:44:17 | Re: win32 socket definition |