Re: Add .gitignore files to CVS?

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Tim Bunce <Tim(dot)Bunce(at)pobox(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Add .gitignore files to CVS?
Date: 2010-01-08 17:34:24
Message-ID: 603c8f071001080934x6d09a004p8eee1e27fb7982ad@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 5:45 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
>> On tor, 2010-01-07 at 22:16 +0000, Tim Bunce wrote:
>>> Is there any reason not to add .gitignore files into the repository?
>
>> I already find the .cvsignore files to be useless and an annoyance to
>> keep up to date (well, I basically ignore them and someone else cleans
>> up after me),
>
> When/if we move off CVS, we should drop the .cvsignore files and insert
> .gitignore (assuming that works the same way).  I am not in favor of
> expecting the core project to maintain support for non-core SCMs though.
> Will we have .bzrignore and who knows what else in there too?
>
> As Peter points out, the only way the things will get maintained is if
> the complaints they suppress are in-the-face of somebody with commit
> access to the core repo.  I like quiet from my "cvs update"s, so I'm
> willing to maintain .cvsignores, but I'm not willing to maintain
> multiple copies of that information.

I would be willing to maintain .gitignore files, under the agreement
that if I should fail or cease to do so, and no one else wants to take
over, then they all get removed. Would that be acceptable?

...Robert

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2010-01-08 17:34:29 Re: Setting oom_adj on linux?
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-01-08 17:31:47 Re: damage control mode