| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PATCH: Add hstore_to_json() |
| Date: | 2010-01-01 00:24:09 |
| Message-ID: | 603c8f070912311624y2497d53bsa4ee28cc0cbc6c17@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> Anyhow, that brings me back to the question I asked upthread, which is
>> "Can/should we suck one of these libraries into our code base (and if
>> so, which?) or do we need to add an analogue of --with-libxml so that
>> we can link against an external library if present and omit the
>> feature otherwise?".
>
> Count me as -1 for "sucking in" any sizable amount of code for this.
> I do not wish to be on the hook to maintain something like that.
OK, that's why I ask these questions. :-)
How much would be "siz(e)able"?
...Robert
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-01-01 00:31:24 | Re: Serializable Isolation without blocking |
| Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2010-01-01 00:18:02 | Re: Serializable Isolation without blocking |