2009/12/17 Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> 2009/12/16 KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>:
>> >>>> ? ?long desc: When turned on, privilege checks on large objects perform with
>> >>>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? backward compatibility as 8.4.x or earlier releases.
>> Mostly English quality, but there are some other issues too. Proposed
>> patch attached.
> I remember we had discussions about the version number, like
> "Don't use '8.5' because it might be released as '9.0'", no?
I chose to follow the style which Tom indicated that he preferred
here. We don't use the phrase "8.4.x series" anywhere else in the
documentation, so this doesn't seem like a good time to start. Tom or
I will go through and renumber everything if we end up renaming the
release to 9.0.
> Another comment is I'd like to keep <link linkend="catalog-pg-largeobject-metadata">
> for the first <structname>pg_largeobject</structname> in each topic.
Those two things aren't the same. Perhaps you meant <link
linkend="catalog-pg-largeobject">? I'll tweak the pg_largeobject and
pg_largeobject_metadata sections to make sure each has a link to the
other and commit this. I also found one more spelling mistake so I
will include that correction as well.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2009-12-17 14:35:39|
|Subject: Re: NOT IN Doesn't use Anti Joins?|
|Previous:||From: Rod Taylor||Date: 2009-12-17 14:02:57|
|Subject: NOT IN Doesn't use Anti Joins?|