Re: Largeobject Access Controls (r2460)

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Largeobject Access Controls (r2460)
Date: 2009-12-16 22:25:33
Message-ID: 603c8f070912161425t5c25c30cwa5a37a39709756ad@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 10:41 PM, Takahiro Itagaki
<itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>
> KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> What's your opinion about:
>>   long desc: When turned on, privilege checks on large objects perform with
>>              backward compatibility as 8.4.x or earlier releases.
>
> I updated the description as your suggest.
>
> Applied with minor editorialization,
> mainly around tab-completion support in psql.

The documentation in this patch needs work.

...Robert

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-12-16 22:29:39 Re: Does "verbose" Need to be Reserved?
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2009-12-16 22:25:24 Re: Range types