Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Largeobject Access Controls (r2460)

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Largeobject Access Controls (r2460)
Date: 2009-12-16 22:25:33
Message-ID: 603c8f070912161425t5c25c30cwa5a37a39709756ad@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 10:41 PM, Takahiro Itagaki
<itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>
> KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> What's your opinion about:
>>   long desc: When turned on, privilege checks on large objects perform with
>>              backward compatibility as 8.4.x or earlier releases.
>
> I updated the description as your suggest.
>
> Applied with minor editorialization,
> mainly around tab-completion support in psql.

The documentation in this patch needs work.

...Robert

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2009-12-16 22:29:39
Subject: Re: Does "verbose" Need to be Reserved?
Previous:From: Jeff DavisDate: 2009-12-16 22:25:24
Subject: Re: Range types

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group