Re: CommitFest status/management

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: CommitFest status/management
Date: 2009-12-03 03:04:22
Message-ID: 603c8f070912021904q3d11fee8w8918096d702fd8e0@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 9:43 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 9:42 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>>> If we went with Bruce's interpretation, we could have a "committer"
>>> field that only appears when the status is "Claimed by Committer" or
>>> "Committed" and the contents of that field could be displayed in
>>> parentheses in the status column, like this: Claimed by Committer (Tom
>>> Lane).
>>
>>> If we went with Andrew's interpretation, we would need a completely
>>> separate column, because there wouldn't be any logical relationship
>>> between the status field and the committer field.
>>
>>> Any other votes?  Tom?
>>
>> I'm happy with Andrew's interpretation --- I just want a separate text
>> field for inserting a committer's name.  I don't want any magic behavior
>> of that field.
>
> OK, I'll add a separate text field for the committer's name, but for
> now it won't display on the summary page, just the detail page.

Done.

...Robert

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jerome Alet 2009-12-03 03:09:29 Re: [Bacula-users] Catastrophic changes to PostgreSQL 8.4
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-12-03 03:03:18 Re: Catastrophic changes to PostgreSQL 8.4