Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Re: [PATCH] bugfix for int2vectorin
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 10:38 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote: > Caleb Welton <cwelton(at)greenplum(dot)com> writes: >> I believe the int2vectorin function should handle invalid input more cleanly. > > Why bother? Under what circumstances would users (or anyone at all) > be putting data into an int2vector? It's an internal type and is > certainly not meant for use in user tables. Maybe it's just me, but this seems like an unnecessarily dismissive response to a report of some rather odd-looking behavior. ...Robert
In response to
- Re: [PATCH] bugfix for int2vectorin at 2009-12-02 03:38:17 from Tom Lane
pgsql-hackers by date
Next: From: Joshua Tolley Date: 2009-12-02 03:53:49 Subject: Re: PL/Python array support Previous: From: Caleb Welton Date: 2009-12-02 03:52:29 Subject: Re: [PATCH] bugfix for int2vectorin