Re: CommitFest 2009-09, two weeks on

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: CommitFest 2009-09, two weeks on
Date: 2009-09-30 17:01:25
Message-ID: 603c8f070909301001g2901a0bey5883131272abc83c@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 12:34 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> ... (and many of the more
>> significant remaining patches look like they are right up Tom's alley
>> anyway).
>
> FWIW, if left to my own devices I will eventually get to everything
> except the dblink, ecpg, and encoding/win32 patches.  I don't intend
> to touch any of those because there are other committers better
> qualified to review them.  (I don't actually think we have anybody
> except Michael who's really familiar with ecpg.)

Thanks, I think that's helpful information.

> However, if no other committers are working on it it's going to be
> a long commitfest ...

That is my concern as well.

> The other problem is that most of the patches are not Ready for
> Committer anyway.

I (and hopefully the people who agreed to help with patch-chasing) can
work on this, but given that there are 5 that are Ready for Committer
and probably as many more that are close, and further given that in
the past 7 days exactly 1 patch from the CommitFest has been
committed, I'm not sure there's a real problem here. If you
commit/bounce all 5 of those afternoon I will spend the evening making
sure you have a few more to tackle tomorrow.

...Robert

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2009-09-30 17:14:30 Re: TODO item: Allow more complex user/database default GUC settings
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2009-09-30 16:58:26 Re: Linux LSB init script