| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Roger Leigh <rleigh(at)codelibre(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Brad T(dot) Sliger" <brad(at)sliger(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Selena Deckelmann <selenamarie(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Roger Leigh <rleigh(at)debian(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Unicode UTF-8 table formatting for psql text output |
| Date: | 2009-09-30 16:06:45 |
| Message-ID: | 603c8f070909300906n41045f14l29a8c7cfbdc12a57@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>> Thinking about this some more, ISTM a much better way of approaching it
>> would be to provide a flag for psql to turn off the fancy formatting,
>> and have pg_regress use that flag.
>
> Yeah, that's not a bad idea. There are likely to be other client
> programs that won't want this behavioral change either.
I'm surprised there isn't one already. I would think that any new
format would default to off.
...Robert
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-09-30 16:13:55 | Re: TODO item: Allow more complex user/database default GUC settings |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2009-09-30 16:01:32 | Re: CommitFest 2009-09, two weeks on |