On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 3:20 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-09-20 at 22:54 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> It seems like there is some support for what this patch is trying to
>> do, but much disagreement about the details of how to get there.
>> Where do we go from here?
> I think the next step would be to outline what changes would be
> necessary in pg_ctl to implement LSB behavior. And then decide case by
> case whether it should become the default, an option, or is not
> appropriate for pg_ctl.
> Kevin apparently sort of agreed to do that when he came back.
Given the lack of progress here, I'm going to move this one to
"Returned with Feedback" for now. I think Kevin is busy with his
non-PostgreSQL life, and there's always next CommitFest.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2009-09-27 19:03:11|
|Subject: Re: pg_hba.conf: samehost and samenet [REVIEW]|
|Previous:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2009-09-27 18:28:19|
|Subject: Re: Issues for named/mixed function notation patch|