Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Linux LSB init script

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Wolfgang Wilhelm <wolfgang20121964(at)yahoo(dot)de>
Subject: Re: Linux LSB init script
Date: 2009-09-27 19:00:08
Message-ID: 603c8f070909271200y7829412fqd93eb94385f410f6@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 3:20 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-09-20 at 22:54 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> It seems like there is some support for what this patch is trying to
>> do, but much disagreement about the details of how to get there.
>> Where do we go from here?
>
> I think the next step would be to outline what changes would be
> necessary in pg_ctl to implement LSB behavior.  And then decide case by
> case whether it should become the default, an option, or is not
> appropriate for pg_ctl.
>
> Kevin apparently sort of agreed to do that when he came back.

Given the lack of progress here, I'm going to move this one to
"Returned with Feedback" for now.  I think Kevin is busy with his
non-PostgreSQL life, and there's always next CommitFest.

...Robert

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2009-09-27 19:03:11
Subject: Re: pg_hba.conf: samehost and samenet [REVIEW]
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2009-09-27 18:28:19
Subject: Re: Issues for named/mixed function notation patch

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group