| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Wolfgang Wilhelm <wolfgang20121964(at)yahoo(dot)de> |
| Subject: | Re: Linux LSB init script |
| Date: | 2009-09-17 20:52:45 |
| Message-ID: | 603c8f070909171352x57cf1dbfm3dc0e39ac8c4be25@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 4:18 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> On tor, 2009-09-17 at 11:59 -0500, Kevin Grittner wrote:
>> > Well, in such cases it may be useful to add an option such as
>> > --oknodo to select the idempotent behavior.
>>
>> I found that confusing (as did Robert); how about --lsm-conforming?
>
> s/lsm/lsb/
>
> I'm not so sure that I would label it as LSB, because that is too broad,
> and not very descriptive.
>
> I think this option should only control whether start and stop are
> idempotent. Other LSB issues such as exit codes ought to become the
> default, or possibly a different option if necessary.
Maybe we should just call it --idempotent.
Or, they could be additional actions, like ensure-start/ensure-stop.
...Robert
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-09-17 20:59:13 | Re: updated join removal patch |
| Previous Message | Dan Colish | 2009-09-17 20:48:57 | Re: generic copy options |