On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 1:38 AM, Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)toroid(dot)org> wrote:
> At 2009-09-14 21:08:56 -0400, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com wrote:
>>
>> Logging configuration changes
>> - Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)toroid(dot)org>
>
> I reviewed this patch. It's fine. Ready for committer as-is.
>
> But I suggested some minor changes that I thought were useful, and
> posted a new version of the patch including those changes. Besides
> that, I posted a patch to implement a suggestion Peter made in his
> original posting.
>
> What status should I assign the patch now? It's "Needs Review", in
> a sense, but also "Waiting on Author", "Ready for Committer", and
> "Returned with Feedback" ;-)
>
> The patch is completely trivial, before and after, so I feel a bit silly
> even to ask this question. Should I just advance it to "Ready"?

Yep, Ready for Committer sounds good to me.

...Robert

In response to

• Re: CF 2009-09: initial reviewing assignments at 2009-09-16 05:38:51 from Abhijit Menon-Sen

Responses

• Re: CF 2009-09: initial reviewing assignments at 2009-09-16 16:44:34 from Robert Haas

pgsql-rrreviewers by date

Next:	From: Robert Haas	Date: 2009-09-16 16:44:34
	Subject: Re: CF 2009-09: initial reviewing assignments
Previous:	From: Abhijit Menon-Sen	Date: 2009-09-16 05:38:51
	Subject: Re: CF 2009-09: initial reviewing assignments