On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 5:30 AM, Peter Eisentraut<peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> What is "hot" and "standby" about the proposed "hot standby" feature?
Absolutely nothing. It's horribly misnamed.
I have also long argued that "Synchronous Replication" should really
be called "Streaming Replication". Perhaps it may eventually support
a synchronous mode of operation, but that will probably never be the
only one.
...Robert