Re: Review: Revise parallel pg_restore's scheduling heuristic

On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Kevin
Grittner<Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> wrote:
> I wrote:
>
>> So far, all tests have shown no difference in performance based on
>> the patch;
>
> My testing to that point had been on a "big" machine with 16 CPUs and
> 128 GB RAM and dozens of spindles.  Last night I tried with a dual
> core machine with 4 GB RAM and 5 spindles in RAID 5.  Still no
> difference with the patch.
>
> Any suggestions besides the foreign keys?  Should 488 FKs be enough to
> matter here?  (Barring better suggestions, I'll try the small machine
> again tonight with the default configuration, rather than the
> optimized one.)

The other possibility here is that this just doesn't work. :-)

...Robert