| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Upgrading our minimum required flex version for 8.5 |
| Date: | 2009-07-02 15:42:52 |
| Message-ID: | 603c8f070907020842u759b007u2ec073067e6d44e3@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Greg Stark<gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> wrote:
>>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>>> Right, this will only affect people doing development or otherwise
>>>> building from a CVS pull.
>
> Someone doing a CVS pull already needs a specific recent version of
> autoconf anyways. How old is this version of flex compared to the
> version of autoconf we require?
Really? configure is in CVS, so I don't think you need autoconf
unless you want to modify configure.in. Which people may want to do,
but certainly not for every patch.
...Robert
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-07-02 16:26:42 | Re: Upgrading our minimum required flex version for 8.5 |
| Previous Message | Greg Stark | 2009-07-02 15:39:48 | Re: Upgrading our minimum required flex version for 8.5 |