On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Greg Stark<gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> wrote:
>>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>>> Right, this will only affect people doing development or otherwise
>>>> building from a CVS pull.
> Someone doing a CVS pull already needs a specific recent version of
> autoconf anyways. How old is this version of flex compared to the
> version of autoconf we require?
Really? configure is in CVS, so I don't think you need autoconf
unless you want to modify configure.in. Which people may want to do,
but certainly not for every patch.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2009-07-02 16:26:42|
|Subject: Re: Upgrading our minimum required flex version for 8.5 |
|Previous:||From: Greg Stark||Date: 2009-07-02 15:39:48|
|Subject: Re: Upgrading our minimum required flex version for 8.5|