On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 10:09 PM, Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca> wrote:
> * Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> [090527 21:30]:
>> > And actually looking at the history of the gpo repo, the branches are all
>> > messed up with "merges" and stuff that I'm not sure where they are coming
>> > from... 8.2, 8.3, and master(HEAD) are all the same as my gpo repo, but the
>> > back branchs are very bad...
>> This is really quite horrible. What is the best way forward here?
> That depends entirely on what the project wants.
I can't speak for anyone else, but what I want is for the git tree on
git.postgresql.org to match CVS.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2009-05-28 03:14:45|
|Subject: Re: search_path vs extensions|
|Previous:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2009-05-28 02:41:06|
|Subject: Re: User-facing aspects of serializable transactions|