Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andrew Chernow <ac(at)esilo(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf
Date: 2009-03-30 14:22:34
Message-ID: 603c8f070903300722s68b52aa0n8333b6faaa0a46ac@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 9:36 AM, Andrew Chernow <ac(at)esilo(dot)com> wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>> I personally would be happy with the two-argument function solution.
>>
>
> I modified my previous patch to use a two-argument function solution.

This looks OK to me, except I think we should modify the documentation
to PQinitSSL() to say that it you must not use both that function and
PQinitSecure(), and explain that if you need to control initialization
of libcrypto and libssl, you should use that function instead.

...Robert

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2009-03-30 14:23:36
Subject: Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2009-03-30 14:18:29
Subject: Re: 8.3.5: Crash in CountActiveBackends() - lockless race?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group