On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 9:35 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> * Proposal of PITR performance improvement. Fujii Masao posted an
>> updated version of this patch.  I believe it has yet to be reviewed by
>> a committer.
>
> Has it been reviewed by anybody?  There's no trace of reviewing work
> on the commitfest page.  Personally I've been ignoring it on the
> assumption that someone else should review it first.

Yes.

The original patch was submitted by Koichi Suzuki - quite a few other
people have looked at it and provided comments.  Simon Riggs was
assigned as the original reviewer, but for some reason Dave Page
removed his name from the wiki a few days ago (I'm fixing this now).
Actually, this patch has been reviewed by a whole slough of people.

V1:
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/87fxmhc7sc(dot)fsf(at)oxford(dot)xeocode(dot)com
(Greg Stark)
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/490703B6(dot)9060203(at)enterprisedb(dot)com
(Heikki Linnakangas - I forgot about this when I made my previous
statement that it hadn't been looked at by a committer yet; this was a
while ago)
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/1225269154(dot)3971(dot)278(dot)camel(at)ebony(dot)2ndQuadrant
(Simon Riggs)

V2:
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/1228145754(dot)20796(dot)311(dot)camel(at)hp_dx2400_1
(Simon Riggs)
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/3f0b79eb0812022255v45cbbfaau292f5320620eddb9(at)mail(dot)gmail(dot)com
(Fujii Masao)

V3:
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/87hc4qrw5e(dot)fsf(at)oxford(dot)xeocode(dot)com
(quick comment from Greg Stark, no formal review)

V4:
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/20090114101659(dot)89CD(dot)52131E4D(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp
(Itagaki Takahiro)
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/8763k3lgyy(dot)fsf(at)oxford(dot)xeocode(dot)com
(Greg Stark)

As far as I can tell the patch author has responded to all comments
and pretty much done everything right.  I haven't even looked at it
enough to understand what it does or why I should care, but AFAICS
it's had more interest and more reviewing than 90% of what was
submitted for this CommitFest.

...Robert

In response to

• Re: status of remaining patches at 2009-03-08 02:35:58 from Tom Lane

Responses

• Re: status of remaining patches at 2009-03-08 15:35:23 from Alvaro Herrera
• Re: status of remaining patches at 2009-03-08 19:07:50 from Josh Berkus
• Re: status of remaining patches at 2009-03-09 08:53:30 from Dave Page

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Robert Haas	Date: 2009-03-08 05:14:44
	Subject: Re: status of remaining patches
Previous:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2009-03-08 02:35:58
	Subject: Re: status of remaining patches