| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
| Cc: | KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Joshua Brindle <method(at)manicmethod(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable |
| Date: | 2009-01-28 14:36:12 |
| Message-ID: | 603c8f070901280636u584a73e5r8ebe04067926c68@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> That being said, I'd think that if we do need different semantics from
> that for SE-PostgreSQL, we could implement it using a GUC or similar to
> keep the current behavior as well allow the SE-PostgreSQL behavior.
I don't think a GUC is what you need because you need both behaviors
simultaneously, one for MAC and the other for DAC. But I am sure
there must be some way to code around the problem.
...Robert
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | KaiGai Kohei | 2009-01-28 14:41:49 | Re: How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2009-01-28 14:30:55 | Re: How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable |