Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: TODO items for window functions

From: "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Hitoshi Harada" <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: TODO items for window functions
Date: 2008-12-30 18:55:38
Message-ID: 603c8f070812301055j343a9f4bwbaf86bee1c577c43@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> Apparently that analogy didn't impress anyone but me.  AFAICT the
> majority opinion is that we should use the syntax
>
>        create [or replace] [window] function ...
>
> but just ignore the distinction between regular functions and window
> functions for all other function-related SQL commands.  Barring further
> discussion, I'll make that happen in the next day or two.

It impressed me.  I liked making WINDOW a flag that occurs later in
the statement a lot better.

...Robert

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: David FetterDate: 2008-12-30 19:00:59
Subject: Re: about truncate
Previous:From: David FetterDate: 2008-12-30 18:52:30
Subject: Re: TODO items for window functions

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group