Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: array_agg (was Re: The Axe list)

From: "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Ian Caulfield" <ian(dot)caulfield(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: array_agg (was Re: The Axe list)
Date: 2008-10-16 02:33:31
Message-ID: 603c8f070810151933p445978b3td481a5422a2aebf4@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
I've been taking a look at this as well and came up with a slightly
different approach.  The attached patch is intended to go in core (not
contrib) and uses some array-construction facilities that already
exist in core.  I'm not sure which approach is better, so I'll throw
this out there with yours for input...

...Robert
Attachment: array_accum-v1.patch
Description: text/x-diff (5.3 KB)

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2008-10-16 02:42:11
Subject: Re: minimal update
Previous:From: Neil ConwayDate: 2008-10-16 02:18:30
Subject: Memory leak on hashed agg rescan

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2013 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group