Re: array_agg (was Re: The Axe list)

From: "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Ian Caulfield" <ian(dot)caulfield(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: array_agg (was Re: The Axe list)
Date: 2008-10-16 02:33:31
Message-ID: 603c8f070810151933p445978b3td481a5422a2aebf4@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I've been taking a look at this as well and came up with a slightly
different approach. The attached patch is intended to go in core (not
contrib) and uses some array-construction facilities that already
exist in core. I'm not sure which approach is better, so I'll throw
this out there with yours for input...

...Robert

Attachment Content-Type Size
array_accum-v1.patch text/x-diff 5.3 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2008-10-16 02:42:11 Re: minimal update
Previous Message Neil Conway 2008-10-16 02:18:30 Memory leak on hashed agg rescan