Updated patch attached, based on comments from Ryan Bradetich and Tom
Lane, and sync'd to latest CVS version.
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 9:33 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> "Ryan Bradetich" <rbradetich(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 1:00 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> [ something about "your patch" ]
>> This is Robert Haas's patch for the September 2008 commit-fest.
>> I am just offering my review.
> Sorry about that, I got confused by the reply-to-a-reply.
>> Does my first suggestion still make sense for removing the TRUNCATE in
>> pg_class_aclmask() when pg_Authid.rolcatupdate is not set?
> Probably. AFAICS it should be treated exactly like ACL_DELETE, so
> anyplace that acl-whacking code is doing something for ACL_DELETE and
> the patch doesn't add in ACL_TRUNCATE, I'd be suspicious ...
> regards, tom lane
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2008-09-06 05:20:17|
|Subject: Re: [PATCH] "\ef <function>" in psql |
|Previous:||From: Brendan Jurd||Date: 2008-09-06 02:43:39|
|Subject: Re: [PATCH] "\ef <function>" in psql|