| From: | Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Merlin Moncure <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Does psql use nested transactions? |
| Date: | 2004-08-18 00:35:56 |
| Message-ID: | 6.1.1.1.0.20040818103409.05e2e1c8@203.8.195.10 |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
At 09:26 AM 18/08/2004, Philip Warner wrote:
>Also, will the 'interactive-session' check consider an included file (\i)
>to be interactive? I'd vote yes.
In retrospect, I assume the interactive-session limit would not be a
problem here since the command would be entered interactively. The source
of the following commands is irrelevant.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner | __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \
(A.B.N. 75 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \
Fax: (+61) 03 5330 3172 | ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \|
| --________--
PGP key available upon request, | /
and from pgp.mit.edu:11371 |/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2004-08-18 00:48:59 | Re: Does psql use nested transactions? |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-08-18 00:33:57 | Re: 8.0.0beta1: Ownership of implicit sequences after dump/restore |