| From: | Chris Travers <chris(at)metatrontech(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Jon Erdman (aka StuckMojo)" <postgresql(at)thewickedtribe(dot)net>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #5288: Restoring a 7.4.5 -Fc dump using -j 2 segfaults (patch included) |
| Date: | 2010-01-19 18:37:49 |
| Message-ID: | 5ed37b141001191037i3b6a988at7061ec1bfc3d10ab@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Just weighing in here.
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 9:15 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> It doesn't seem worth it
> to try to support parallel restore from nearly-obsolete versions, and
> I suspect that we couldn't do it even if we tried --- the reason the
> representation got changed is that the old way simply didn't work for
> any significant use of the dependency info. Just ignoring the
> dependencies, as your patch effectively proposes, is going to lead to
> restore failures or worse.
Just to clarify, the only part that would not be supported would be
the parallel part, right?
Best Wishes,
Chris Travers
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jon Erdman | 2010-01-19 18:43:49 | Re: BUG #5288: Restoring a 7.4.5 -Fc dump using -j 2 segfaults (patch included) |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-01-19 18:17:46 | Re: BUG #5288: Restoring a 7.4.5 -Fc dump using -j 2 segfaults (patch included) |