| From: | "Douglas McNaught" <doug(at)mcnaught(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "David Fetter" <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL |
| Date: | 2008-05-29 15:48:25 |
| Message-ID: | 5ded07e00805290848v4a539d15v67d2b57afe8f797e@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> The only question I have is... what does this give us that PITR doesn't
> give us?
I think the idea is that WAL records would be shipped (possibly via
socket) and applied as they're generated, rather than on a
file-by-file basis. At least that's what "real-time" implies to me...
-Doug
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2008-05-29 15:49:54 | Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2008-05-29 15:46:22 | Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2008-05-29 15:49:54 | Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2008-05-29 15:46:22 | Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL |