Enumerated (enum) types

From: "Michael Lourant" <lourant(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Enumerated (enum) types
Date: 2008-05-27 14:29:27
Message-ID: 5ac667b80805270729x4f93cc14n4a868d3d3f624d7b@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

Enumerated (enum) types are data types that are comprised of a static,
predefined set of values with a specific order. They are equivalent to the
enum types in a number of programming languages. An example of an enum type
might be the days of the week, or a set of status values for a piece of
data.

*Declaration of Enumerated Types*

Enum types are created using the CREATE TYPE command, for example:

CREATE TYPE mood AS ENUM ('sad', 'ok', 'happy');

Once created, the enum type can be used in table and function definitions
much like any other type:

*Example. Basic Enum Usage*

CREATE TYPE mood AS ENUM ('sad', 'ok', 'happy');
CREATE TABLE person (
name text,
current_mood mood
);

INSERT INTO person VALUES ('Moe', 'happy');
SELECT * FROM person WHERE current_mood = 'happy';
name | current_mood
------+--------------
Moe | happy
(1 row)

*Ordering*

The ordering of the values in an enum type is the order in which the values
were listed when the type was declared. All standard comparison operators
and related aggregate functions are supported for enums. For example:

*Example. Enum Ordering*

INSERT INTO person VALUES ('Larry', 'sad');
INSERT INTO person VALUES ('Curly', 'ok');
SELECT * FROM person WHERE current_mood > 'sad';
name | current_mood
-------+--------------
Moe | happy
Curly | ok
(2 rows)

SELECT * FROM person WHERE current_mood > 'sad' ORDER BY current_mood;
name | current_mood
-------+--------------
Curly | ok
Moe | happy
(2 rows)

SELECT name FROM person
WHERE current_mood = (SELECT MIN(current_mood) FROM person);
name
-------
Larry
(1 row)

*Type Safety*

Enumerated types are completely separate data types and may not be compared
with each other.

*Example. Lack of Casting*

CREATE TYPE happiness AS ENUM ('happy', 'very happy', 'ecstatic');
CREATE TABLE holidays (
num_weeks int,
happiness happiness
);
INSERT INTO holidays(num_weeks,happiness) VALUES (4, 'happy');
INSERT INTO holidays(num_weeks,happiness) VALUES (6, 'very happy');
INSERT INTO holidays(num_weeks,happiness) VALUES (8, 'ecstatic');
INSERT INTO holidays(num_weeks,happiness) VALUES (2, 'sad');
ERROR: invalid input value for enum happiness: "sad"
SELECT person.name, holidays.num_weeks FROM person, holidays
WHERE person.current_mood = holidays.happiness;
ERROR: operator does not exist: mood = happiness

If you really need to do something like that, you can either write a custom
operator or add explicit casts to your query:

*Example. Comparing Different Enums by Casting to Text*

SELECT person.name, holidays.num_weeks FROM person, holidays
WHERE person.current_mood::text = holidays.happiness::text;
name | num_weeks
------+-----------
Moe | 4
(1 row)

*Implementation Details*

An enum value occupies four bytes on disk. The length of an enum value's
textual label is limited by the NAMEDATALEN setting compiled into
PostgreSQL; in standard builds this means at most 63 bytes.

Enum labels are case sensitive, so 'happy' is not the same as 'HAPPY'.
Spaces in the labels are significant, too.

*An Alternative Way To Do The Same*

Instead of using an enum type we can set up a CHECK CONSTRAINT - this tells
postgresql to make sure that the value we are entering is valid.

CREATE TABLE person (
personid int not null primary key,
favourite_colour varchar(255) NOT NULL,
CHECK (favourite_colour IN ('red', 'blue', 'yellow', 'purple'))
);

INSERT INTO person(personid, favourite_colour) VALUES (1, 'red');
INSERT 0 1

Now for something not in the list:

INSERT INTO person(personid, favourite_colour) VALUES (2, 'green');
ERROR: new row for relation "person" violates check constraint
"person_favourite_colour_check"

--
Michael Lourant
"All you need is love"

Responses

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tarlika Elisabeth Schmitz 2008-05-27 15:53:05 UPDATE with table join
Previous Message Sebastian Rychter 2008-05-27 04:34:57 Re: Extremely Low performance with ODBC