Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Copyright update

From: Greg Stark <greg(dot)stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Copyright update
Date: 2009-01-01 19:36:24
Message-ID: 5EE5A86A-A15E-4F59-A740-F950D95105FE@enterprisedb.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Is that actually legal if we haven't modified the files? Or is the  
whole source tree considiered one work?

-- 
Greg


On 1 Jan 2009, at 13:25, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:

> I have updated all the source files for a 2009 copyright;  seems the
> commit message was suppressed due to its size.  Tom found a few more  
> and
> I have adjusted for those as well.
>
> -- 
>  Bruce Momjian  <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>        http://momjian.us
>  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com
>
>  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
>
> -- 
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2009-01-01 19:38:30
Subject: Re: Copyright update
Previous:From: Andreas 'ads' ScherbaumDate: 2009-01-01 19:30:36
Subject: Re: [patch] Reformat permissions in \l+ (like \z does)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group