Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Copyright update

From: Greg Stark <greg(dot)stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Copyright update
Date: 2009-01-01 19:36:24
Message-ID: (view raw or whole thread)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Is that actually legal if we haven't modified the files? Or is the  
whole source tree considiered one work?


On 1 Jan 2009, at 13:25, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:

> I have updated all the source files for a 2009 copyright;  seems the
> commit message was suppressed due to its size.  Tom found a few more  
> and
> I have adjusted for those as well.
> -- 
>  Bruce Momjian  <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
>  EnterpriseDB                   
>  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
> -- 
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2009-01-01 19:38:30
Subject: Re: Copyright update
Previous:From: Andreas 'ads' ScherbaumDate: 2009-01-01 19:30:36
Subject: Re: [patch] Reformat permissions in \l+ (like \z does)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2015 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group