Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Anyone looking to be completed for 8.2?

From: Jim Nasby <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
To: Tzahi Fadida <Tzahi(dot)ML(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-students(at)postgresql(dot)org, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Anyone looking to be completed for 8.2?
Date: 2006-07-29 19:23:38
Message-ID: 5A8A604F-08AC-469B-91FD-C168F26D0215@pervasive.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-students
As Josh said, that's not how point releases work. It's fine to submit  
a patch that still needs some work, but you really need to get the  
initial patch in before Aug. 1st. Just mention any pending work in  
the initial submission (ie: still needs documentation, no regression,  
what-have-you).

On Jul 29, 2006, at 12:21 PM, Tzahi Fadida wrote:

> I don't like last minute things so i'll pass on this one.
> I am sure 8.2.x will come soon and i'll have another chance.
>
> On Saturday 29 July 2006 19:56, Robert Treat wrote:
>> You need to send it as a patch to pgsql-patches for code review.   
>> Include a
>> description of what it is and pointers on how to use it. Also make  
>> note
>> that you think it should be added to contrib with reasons why.   
>> You also
>> need to do this pretty much today... code freeze is Aug 1, so if  
>> something
>> isnt seen before then, it's not likely to get in.
>>
>> Robert Treat
>>
>> On Saturday 29 July 2006 08:06, Tzahi Fadida wrote:
>>> Practically i moved it to beta.
>>> I am still left to document the code better and perhaps improve
>>> the error messages and clean some code fragments but it is finished
>>> feature wise and i've done a lot of testing on it.
>>> Do you need anything from me to put it in contrib or you copy it
>>> directly from pgfoundry?
>>>
>>> On Saturday 29 July 2006 02:35, Jim Nasby wrote:
>>>> Sorry for the noise, but I haven't seen this on -patches. Is it in
>>>> now? Should we be extending feature freeze?
>>>>
>>>> On Jul 15, 2006, at 7:33 PM, Tzahi Fadida wrote:
>>>>> My project is doing what it should do. Still missing one feature i
>>>>> want to
>>>>> enter before people will start to use it but other than that i
>>>>> tested it
>>>>> extensively. It can take a few days.
>>>>> still needs a lot of code clean ups and i need to move it from 8.1
>>>>> dynamic loaded function interface to 8.2
>>>>> but i am guessing it shouldn't be something difficult?
>>>>> The code cleanups and some more features will be finished by  
>>>>> the end
>>>>> of soc.
>>>>>
>>>>> Is there anything else to do than just copying the files into
>>>>> contrib?
>>>>>
>>>>> Aside from the obvious full disjunction functionality i have a
>>>>> feeling people
>>>>> will benefit from the code itself as an example since it uses many
>>>>> aspects of
>>>>> postgresql.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Saturday 15 July 2006 22:50, Josh Berkus wrote:
>>>>>> SoC Mentors,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Feature freeze is officially 2 weeks away.  Just to check, are
>>>>>> there any
>>>>>> SoC projects which look to be both:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> a) generally applicable enough to be in 8.2, and
>>>>>> b) near-production quality by the end of SoC?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We said at the beginning of SoC that we'd re-evaluate near  
>>>>>> feature
>>>>>> freeze
>>>>>> time if we wanted to wait for an SoC feature; is there anything?
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>         Tzahi.
>>>>> --
>>>>> Tzahi Fadida
>>>>> Blog: http://tzahi.blogsite.org | Home Site: http:// 
>>>>> tzahi.webhop.info
>>>>> WARNING TO SPAMMERS:  see at
>>>>> http://members.lycos.co.uk/my2nis/spamwarning.html
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------(end of
>>>>> broadcast)---------------------------
>>>>> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>>>>>
>>>>>                http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant      jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
>>>> Pervasive Software      http://pervasive.com    work: 512-231-6117
>>>> vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf       cell: 512-569-9461
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------(end of
>>>> broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: In versions below  
>>>> 8.0, the
>>>> planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your  
>>>> joining
>>>> column's datatypes do not match
>
> -- 
> Regards,
>         Tzahi.
> --
> Tzahi Fadida
> Blog: http://tzahi.blogsite.org | Home Site: http://tzahi.webhop.info
> WARNING TO SPAMMERS:  see at
> http://members.lycos.co.uk/my2nis/spamwarning.html
>
> ---------------------------(end of  
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
>                http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
>

--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant      jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software      http://pervasive.com    work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf       cell: 512-569-9461



In response to

Responses

pgsql-students by date

Next:From: Tzahi FadidaDate: 2006-07-31 11:58:41
Subject: Re: Anyone looking to be completed for 8.2?
Previous:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2006-07-29 17:23:01
Subject: Re: Anyone looking to be completed for 8.2?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group