On 7/19/05, Christopher Petrilli <petrilli(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> It looks like the CVS HEAD is definately "better," but not by a huge
> amount. The only difference is I wasn't run autovacuum in the
> background (default settings), but I don't think this explains it.
> Here's a graph of the differences and density of behavior:
> I can provide the raw data. Each COPY was 500 rows. Note that fsync
> is turned off here. Maybe it'd be more stable with it turned on?
I've updated this with trend-lines.
| Christopher Petrilli
In response to
pgsql-performance by date
|Next:||From: Richard Huxton||Date: 2005-07-20 17:01:41|
|Subject: Re: Optimizer seems to be way off, why?|
|Previous:||From: Christopher Petrilli||Date: 2005-07-20 15:52:52|
|Subject: Re: Impact of checkpoint_segments under continual load conditions|