Re: [GENERAL] Fragments in tsearch2 headline

From: "Pierre-Yves Strub" <pierre(dot)yves(dot)strub(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: sushant354(at)gmail(dot)com
Cc: "Teodor Sigaev" <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, "Pgsql Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Fragments in tsearch2 headline
Date: 2008-05-25 00:20:05
Message-ID: 592647410805241720i395bc8e8o770843dfce93cd1f@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 11:18 PM, Sushant Sinha <sushant354(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> Does this mean we want a unified function ts_headline and we trigger the
> fragments if NumFragments is specified? It seems that introducing a new
> function which can take configuration OID, or name is complex as there
> are so many functions handling these issues in wparser.c.
>
> If this is true then we need to just add marking of headline words in
> prsd_headline. Otherwise we will need another prsd_headline_with_covers
> function.

I think that we could merge down the two functions using a default
cover of the whole text when NumCovers if missing. I started writing
the function. The only missing information is, as you stated, the
missing posititions in HeadlineParsedText.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message jcvlz 2008-05-25 02:41:43 Re: best er modeling tool for postgreSQL
Previous Message Steve Atkins 2008-05-24 21:59:04 Re: Optimzing Postgresql

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-05-25 03:15:27 Re: \df displaying volatility
Previous Message Rainer Bauer 2008-05-24 22:01:10 Re: Execution-time-sensitive timestamp regression tests