Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: BUG #5747: TimeStamps too far into the future are invalid

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Kurt Stam" <kstam(at)apache(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #5747: TimeStamps too far into the future are invalid
Date: 2010-11-10 17:42:51
Message-ID: 5895.1289410971@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs
"Kurt Stam" <kstam(at)apache(dot)org> writes:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JUDDI-374

There is no evidence whatsoever on that page to demonstrate that there's
any such postgresql bug.  What's more, simple testing suggests that PG
is perfectly happy with timestamps of 2100 or even further out.  If
you'd like us to believe we have something to fix, please exhibit some
SQL commands that deliver an incorrect result.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-11-10 18:57:27
Subject: Re: BUG #5745: geometry bug?
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-11-10 17:36:15
Subject: Re: BUG #5745: geometry bug?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group