From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: psql's \d commands --- end of the line for 1-character identifiers? |
Date: | 2002-12-12 04:14:43 |
Message-ID: | 588.1039666483@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Tom Lane writes:
>> How do you mean "where"?
> I was more wondering where in the source tree to put and how to install
> it. I would suggest the following: I have a file information_schema.sql
> which contains the commands to create the information schema in a
> user-space manner. I'd put it into backend/catalog, from there it gets
> installed in the same place the .bki files go, and initdb installs it into
> template1 near the end.
Ah. That works for me.
> Maybe someone wants to make a case for putting the information schema
> definitions into a bunch of separate .sql files, one for each item defined
> in the standard?
One file per item is way overkill ... especially when there's no obvious
reason that people would want some but not all of these items.
> We also have to think whether we want to magically represent the
> information_schema in the search path as the spec prescribes.
We already have the necessary mechanism to let this be set on a
per-installation (or even per-database or per-user) basis. I agree with
your thought that we need not make it the factory default.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-12-12 05:38:54 | Re: PQnotifies() in 7.3 broken? |
Previous Message | Philip Warner | 2002-12-12 01:57:27 | Re: DB Tuning Notes - Where To? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jon Jensen | 2002-12-12 05:40:09 | Re: Refuse SSL patch |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-12-11 23:08:46 | Re: [BUGS] Bug #718: request for improvement of /? to show |