3ware vs Areca

From: Jeff <threshar(at)torgo(dot)978(dot)org>
To: Pgsql performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: 3ware vs Areca
Date: 2008-07-11 13:26:37
Message-ID: 581D2333-E731-4843-BC31-39840E272C62@torgo.978.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

I've got a couple boxes with some 3ware 9550 controllers, and I'm
less than pleased with performance on them.. Sequential access is
nice, but start seeking around and you kick it in the gut. (I've
found posts on the internets about others having similar issues). My
last box with a 3ware I simply had it in jbod mode and used sw raid
and it smoked the hw.

Anyway, anybody have experience in 3ware vs Areca - I've heard plenty
of good anecdotal things that Areca is much better, just wondering if
anybody here has firsthand experience. It'll be plugged into about
8 10k rpm sata disks.

thanks
--
Jeff Trout <jeff(at)jefftrout(dot)com>
http://www.stuarthamm.net/
http://www.dellsmartexitin.com/

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2008-07-11 13:44:23 Re: Altering a column type - Most efficient way
Previous Message Mario Weilguni 2008-07-11 08:01:08 Re: Altering a column type - Most efficient way