Re: What's going on with pgfoundry?

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, Steve Crawford <scrawford(at)pinpointresearch(dot)com>
Cc: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: What's going on with pgfoundry?
Date: 2008-11-26 22:06:42
Message-ID: 57CDEDA4653F29D0E60CAAEC@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

- --On Wednesday, November 26, 2008 14:00:59 -0800 "Joshua D. Drake"
<jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:

> Since were chatting :P. My vote would be to move everything back to port
> 22 and force key based auth only.

How does that work? Does that kill the script kiddies in their tracks? I'm
guessing so, but had never thought to try it ...

How would someone upload their key if they don't have access? Some sort of web
interface? One wouldn't want to throw extra admin overhead if it can be
avoided ...

- --
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org MSN . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAkktyHIACgkQ4QvfyHIvDvPUFwCfbV3QhjxF3kA7szsTeZp5ZIm8
AfUAn3NiwLA9r0hhs3camv4GstIpcJil
=I4+l
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2008-11-26 22:10:07 Re: What's going on with pgfoundry?
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2008-11-26 22:00:59 Re: What's going on with pgfoundry?