Re: pg_dump and REVOKE on function

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Subject: Re: pg_dump and REVOKE on function
Date: 2003-08-31 04:44:25
Message-ID: 5775.1062305065@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Given that rbt is the owner of the object, I'm not sure that it is
>> sensible to interpret the above as revoking his ability to grant
>> privileges to others.
>>
>> Peter, any thoughts?

> Has this been resolved?

No. I was hoping Peter would comment before we decide what to do.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lee Kindness 2003-08-31 09:37:40 Re: Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)
Previous Message Mark Kirkwood 2003-08-31 04:43:50 Re: Is it a memory leak in PostgreSQL 7.4beta?