Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: So where are we on the open commitfest?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: So where are we on the open commitfest?
Date: 2011-10-29 03:40:06
Message-ID: 5715.1319859606@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> * Range Types
>> 
>> This has certainly had plenty of work done too. If it's not committable
>> yet, I think we should mark it Returned With Feedback for now.

> I have been thinking about looking at committing at least part of
> this, but thought Heikki might be planning to pick it up.

Yeah, this one is in Heikki's court AFAIK.

I've updated the commitfest items for which there seemed to be no
disagreement.  We still have

>> * Allow encoding specific character incrementer (on your head)
>> * Separating bgwriter and checkpointer (on Simon's)
>> * Non-inheritable check constraints (on Greg Stark's)
>> * Range Types (on Heikki's)
>> * unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf (Simon's on the hook to advance this discussion)

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Hitoshi HaradaDate: 2011-10-29 07:25:46
Subject: Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2011-10-29 01:22:48
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade if 'postgres' database is dropped

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group