Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> * Range Types
>> This has certainly had plenty of work done too. If it's not committable
>> yet, I think we should mark it Returned With Feedback for now.
> I have been thinking about looking at committing at least part of
> this, but thought Heikki might be planning to pick it up.
Yeah, this one is in Heikki's court AFAIK.
I've updated the commitfest items for which there seemed to be no
disagreement. We still have
>> * Allow encoding specific character incrementer (on your head)
>> * Separating bgwriter and checkpointer (on Simon's)
>> * Non-inheritable check constraints (on Greg Stark's)
>> * Range Types (on Heikki's)
>> * unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf (Simon's on the hook to advance this discussion)
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Hitoshi Harada||Date: 2011-10-29 07:25:46|
|Subject: Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server|
|Previous:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2011-10-29 01:22:48|
|Subject: Re: pg_upgrade if 'postgres' database is dropped|