| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Sergey E(dot) Koposov" <math(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)ru> |
| Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su> |
| Subject: | Re: SOC & user quotas |
| Date: | 2007-02-28 17:56:13 |
| Message-ID: | 5707.1172685373@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Sergey E. Koposov" <math(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)ru> writes:
> Per user AND per database (as Tom noted). But I dont see what's odd in
> it... It exists in Oracle, and I need quotas in the project on which I'm
> working. And I remember user requests for quotas in the mailing lists ...
It hasn't ever made it onto the TODO list, which means there's not a
consensus that we need it. If it were a simple, small, low-impact patch
then you probably wouldn't need to do much convincing that it's an
important feature to have, but I'm afraid the patch will be none of
those things.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-02-28 17:58:04 | Re: [HACKERS] |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-02-28 17:48:12 | Re: SOC & user quotas |