Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Review: listagg aggregate

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: Marko Tiikkaja <marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Review: listagg aggregate
Date: 2010-01-28 17:30:30
Message-ID: 56D74E63-7507-439D-8B7B-AF159FA1330A@kineticode.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Jan 28, 2010, at 9:29 AM, Marko Tiikkaja wrote:

> Someone might have a perfectly good use case for using different
> delimiters.  I don't think it's a good idea to be artificially limiting
> what you can and can't do.

+1

David


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2010-01-28 17:42:26
Subject: Re: Streaming replication, and walsender during recovery
Previous:From: Marko TiikkajaDate: 2010-01-28 17:29:04
Subject: Re: Review: listagg aggregate

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group