Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Reliable and fast money transaction design

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Reliable and fast money transaction design
Date: 2007-08-29 16:38:11
Message-ID: 5652.1188405491@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
>> Argh!!!  The RDBMS that I typically use defaults to SERIALIZABLE.

> SERIALIZABLE is really slow :).

Say what?  If anything it's probably faster than READ COMMITTED, because
it doesn't take as many snapshots.  But the difference is likely down in
the noise anyway.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2007-08-29 16:50:19
Subject: Re: Reliable and fast money transaction design
Previous:From: Ron JohnsonDate: 2007-08-29 16:22:14
Subject: Re: ACID (was Re: Reliable and fast ...)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group