"Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> Did Heikki's patch to move the xmin forward during VACUUM get rejected?
> That seems like it has a much wider use case.
It's still in the queue (which I have finally started to review in
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2007-03-26 20:01:41|
|Subject: Re: Improvement of procArray.xmin for VACUUM|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2007-03-26 19:40:29|
|Subject: Re: IDENTITY/GENERATED v36 Re: Final version of IDENTITY/GENERATED patch |