Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Improvement of procArray.xmin for VACUUM

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "PostgreSQL-patches" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Improvement of procArray.xmin for VACUUM
Date: 2007-03-26 19:44:27
Message-ID: 5630.1174938267@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
"Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> Did Heikki's patch to move the xmin forward during VACUUM get rejected?
> That seems like it has a much wider use case.

It's still in the queue (which I have finally started to review in
earnest).

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2007-03-26 20:01:41
Subject: Re: Improvement of procArray.xmin for VACUUM
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-03-26 19:40:29
Subject: Re: IDENTITY/GENERATED v36 Re: Final version of IDENTITY/GENERATED patch

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group