Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [GENERAL] SHA1 on postgres 8.3

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] SHA1 on postgres 8.3
Date: 2008-04-02 16:49:38
Message-ID: 5612.1207154978@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-generalpgsql-hackers
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> writes:
> Re: compulsively attempting to comply with every law everywhere, let's
> recall that a certain Search! engine company managed to get itself in
> a morally pretty reprehensible spot by "following the laws" of an
> oppressive regime.  We needn't do the same.

We aren't actually doing any such thing.  We are just making sure that
our distribution is split up in such a way that if someone *else* needs
to comply with such a law, it's not impractical to do so.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-04-02 16:54:07
Subject: Re: Several tags around PostgreSQL 7.1 broken
Previous:From: Steve CrawfordDate: 2008-04-02 16:43:20
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] SHA1 on postgres 8.3

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: David FetterDate: 2008-04-02 16:55:09
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] SHA1 on postgres 8.3
Previous:From: Ian SillitoeDate: 2008-04-02 16:49:37
Subject: (FAQ?) JOIN condition - 'WHERE NULL = NULL'

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group